Compare provider task performance
Compare how Tasks that your tool performs against top providers adopted across multiple agent configurations.
STEP 1 · INPUT > how easily can coding agents add authentication to a Next.js app?
Turn coding agentsinto users.
We simulate and improve how Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor discover, execute, and integrate your developer tool.
Trace Agent Traffic
See where the developer traffic is coming from, being routed towards and to whom.
Friction per task
Time per task
Cost per task
Track and Optimize tool performance
Measurements that we track drive the dev adoption include per task Time-to-value, Token-to-value cost, Quality across developer workflows when integrating SDK MCP, CLI and Skills Implementations. Quality is based on the friction identified for a provider relative to competitors.
Isolate provider friction
We guide controlled experiments that uncover friction and isolate provider-specific sources. Friction found through independent simulations that throw agents off is usually not isolated to Provider caused web surfaces and need further analysis to narrow down search and reduce regressions long-term.
Recent Blog Posts
View allFrom Developer Preference to Agent-Led Growth
How developer priorities shape the choices coding agents make, and what those choices mean for developer tool adoption.
Introducing Morphiq Bench: Agent Adoption Benchmarking for Developer Tools
Morphiq Bench is an agent adoption benchmark for developer tools, centered on the Agent Affinity Index and its Affinity Score.
